Ex Parte Duck et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                             
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                           ____________________                                                 
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                           ____________________                                                 
                                Ex parte JAKOB DÜCK, MARTIN KLEINE,                                             
                                ANDREAS NASS, and DIRK SCHMIEDING                                               
                                           ____________________                                                 
                                              Appeal 2007-0720                                                  
                                           Application 10/410,993                                               
                                           Technology Center 2800                                               
                                           ____________________                                                 
                                           Decided: May 23, 2007                                                
                                           ____________________                                                 
                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and MAHSHID D.                                          
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   
                       Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final                     
                rejection of claims 1-18, which are all of the claims pending in this                           
                application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                      
                       Appellants’ invention relates to a modular plug-in connector to be                       
                used in a distributed-configuration machine for generating, evaluating, or                      
                relaying electrical, electronic, optoelectronic, or pneumatic control signals                   
                directly at the unit to be controlled (Specification 1).  According to                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013