Ex Parte Scardino et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                         Ex parte PATRICIA SCARDINO, ROBERT P. MORRIS,                                          
                                      and HUGH BLAKE SVENDSEN                                                   
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0723                                                  
                                           Application 10/310,527                                               
                                           Technology Center 2100                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                           Decided: June 26, 2007                                               
                                                ____________                                                    

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,                                                  
                and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This appeal involves claims 1 through 12, 15 through 26, and 33,                         
                which constitute all claims pending in the application.  We have jurisdiction                   
                under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                                                                
                       Representative independent claim 1 is reproduce below:                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013