Ex Parte Butt et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0727                                                                                
                Application 09/951,711                                                                          


                       1.  An apparatus comprising:                                                             
                             a local application proxy (LAP) arrangement to provide a                           
                machine-to-network proxy interface and proxy services for local                                 
                applications resident on an electronic machine wherein the LAP arrangement                      
                further comprises an automatic network awareness arrangement to                                 
                automatically gain network awareness of a network which becomes                                 
                connected thereto, a gained network awareness being used to effect                              
                provision of proxy services.                                                                    
                       The following references are relied on by the Examiner:                                  
                Kralowetz    US 5,657,452  Aug. 12, 1997                                                        
                Schloss   US 5,878,233  Mar. 2, 1999                                                            
                Puranik   US 6,003,090  Dec. 14, 1999                                                           
                Wookey   US 6,023,507  Feb. 8, 2000                                                             

                       Claims 1, 6-9, 14-17, 22-25, and 30-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
                § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kralowetz.  Claims 3-5, 11-13, 19-21, and                      
                27-29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness,                     
                the Examiner combines Kralowetz with Puranik for claims 3, 11, 19, and 27.                      
                Kralowetz is combined with Wookey for claims 4, 12, 20, and 28.                                 
                Kralowetz is combined with Schloss for claims 5, 13, 21, and 29.                                
                       Rather than repeat the positions of the Appellants and the Examiner,                     
                reference is made to the Brief and Reply Brief for the Appellants’ positions,                   
                and to the Answer for the Examiner’s positions.                                                 

                                                  OPINION                                                       
                       We affirm.                                                                               




                                                       2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013