Ex Parte Katsukawa et al - Page 6

               Appeal 2007-0732                                                                             
               Application 09/799,502                                                                       

               reasonable construction, the limitations require storing data used to log a                  
               user into an application on a server.                                                        

                                        B. ANTICIPATION ANALYSIS                                            
                      "[A]nticipation is a question of fact."  In re Hyatt, 211 F.3d 1367,                  
               1371-72, 54 USPQ2d 1664, 1667 (citing Bischoff v. Wethered, 76 U.S. (9                       
               Wall.) 812, 814-15 (1869); In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44                          
               USPQ2d 1429, 1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997)).  "A reference anticipates a claim if it                 
               discloses the claimed invention 'such that a skilled artisan could take its                  
               teachings in combination with his own knowledge of the particular art and                    
               be in possession of the invention.'"  In re Graves, 69 F.3d 1147, 1152, 36                   
               USPQ2d 1697, 1701 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (quoting In re LeGrice, 301 F.2d 929,                     
               936, 133 USPQ 365, 372 (CCPA 1962)).                                                         

                      Of course, anticipation "is not an 'ipsissimis verbis' test."  In re Bond,            
               910 F.2d 831, 832, 15 USPQ2d 1566, 1567 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (citing Akzo                        
               N.V. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 808 F.2d 1471, 1479 & n.11, 1                      
               USPQ2d 1241, 1245 & n.11 (Fed. Cir. 1986)).  "An anticipatory reference . .                  
               . need not duplicate word for word what is in the claims."  Standard Havens                  
               Prods. v. Gencor Indus., Inc., 953 F.2d 1360, 1369, 21 USPQ2d 1321, 1328                     
               (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                                                            

                      Here, Navarre "relates . . . to a new system and method for executing                 
               a request from a client application."  (Col. 1, ll. 5-7.)  "FIG. 2 is a block                
               diagram of a network environment 200. . . ."  (Col. 2, ll. 21-22.)  "As shown                


                                                     6                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013