Ex Parte Nilsson et al - Page 6

                Appeal 2007-0738                                                                                
                Application 11/109,274                                                                          

                       As a final point, with respect to the § 103 rejection, we note that                      
                Appellants base no argument upon objective evidence of nonobviousness,                          
                such as unexpected results.                                                                     
                       In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the Examiner's decision                           
                rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.                                                      
                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                       
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept.                      
                13, 2004).                                                                                      
                                                 AFFIRMED                                                       









                cam                                                                                             

                The Dow Chemical Company                                                                        
                Intellectual Property Section                                                                   
                P. O. Box 1967                                                                                  
                Midland, MI  48641-1967                                                                         








                                                       6                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6

Last modified: September 9, 2013