Appeal 2007-0760
Application 09/974,373
CONCLUSION OF LAW
On the record before us, Appellant has shown that the Examiner failed
to establish that one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the present
invention, would have concluded that Barker in combination with Foley
renders claims 1 through 32 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
DECISION
We reverse the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 through 32
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of
Barker and Foley.
REVERSED
JRH:pgc
FREDERICK W. GIBB, III
Gibb & Rahman, LLC
2568-A RIVA ROAD
SUITE 304
ANNAPOLIS MD 21401
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013