1
2 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
3 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
4
5
6 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
7 __________
8
9 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND
10 INTERFERENCES
11 __________
12
13 Ex parte TENLEY ANNE CARP,
14 MILTON B. FRIEDMAN and
15 NATALYA B. DAVIDOV
16 __________
17
18 Appeal 2007-0768
19 Application 10/430,8831
20 Technology Center 3600
21 __________
22
23 Decided: March 22, 2007
24 __________
25
26 Before HUBERT C. LORIN, JENNIFER D. BAHR and LINDA E.
26 HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
27
28
29 LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
30
31
32 DECISION ON APPEAL
33
34
35
36
37
1 Filed 7 May 2003. The real party in interest is JurySignUp.com.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013