Ex Parte Dorenbosch et al - Page 2



             Appeal 2007-0786                                                                                     
             Application 10/262,142                                                                               
                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                     
                    Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s final                      
             rejection of claims 1-27.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). We                    
             reverse.                                                                                             
                                              THE INVENTION                                                       
                    Appellants claim a method and apparatus for scheduling and facilitating a                     
             meeting (Specification 1:4-5).  Claim 1, reproduced below, is representative of the                  
             subject matter on appeal.                                                                            
                          1.  A method of scheduling a meeting comprising:                                        
                                 specifying a plurality of individuals to participate                             
                          in the meeting and a list of desired resources for                                      
                          facilitating the meeting;                                                               
                                 communicating with a plurality of scheduling                                     
                          agents corresponding, respectively, with the plurality of                               
                          individuals and with a processor function embedded with                                 
                          a resource corresponding to the list of desired resources;                              
                                 negotiating with the plurality of scheduling agents                              
                          to determine availability of the plurality of individuals                               
                          and with the processor function embedded with the                                       
                          resource to determine availability of the resource; and                                 
                                 scheduling the meeting at a time when the resource                               
                          and a sufficient number of the plurality of individuals are                             
                          available.                                                                              

                                              THE REJECTIONS                                                      
                    The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence in support of the                          
             rejections:                                                                                          

                                                        2                                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013