The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES P. VON WOLSKE
____________
Appeal 2007-0817
Application 10/992,253
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: September 27, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 8, 14-18, 21, 22,
28-31 and 35. Claims 32-34 and 36 stand allowed. Claims 2-7, 9-13, 19, 20
and 23-27 stand objected to as directed to allowable subject matter. These
are all of the claims in the application.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013