Appeal 2007-0834
Application 09/757,913
taking a snapshot of the compression and decompression context
information in the first network entity including storing said
context information snapshot in the first network entity; and
changing the connection between the first network entity and the
mobile terminal to a connection between the mobile terminal and a second
network entity including transferring the context information snapshot stored
by the first network entity to the second network entity which is stored by
the second network entity as the context information of the second network
entity and using the stored context information at the mobile terminal and
the second network entity for compression and decompression of
the headers of the packets.
THE REFERENCES
The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of
unpatentability:
Chen US 6,529,527 B1 Mar. 4, 2003
Maggenti US 6,477,150 B1 Nov. 5, 2002
THE REJECTION
The following rejection is on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Chen in view of Maggenti.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the Examiner, we
make reference to the Briefs and the Answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
Only those arguments actually made by Appellants have been
considered in this decision. It is our view, after consideration of the record
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013