Ex Parte Bunker - Page 7
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2007 > Ex Parte Bunker - Page 7
find persuasive above. Therefore, we will sustain the rejection of
independent claim 12 and dependent claims 13-22 which Appellant has not
provided separate argument for patentability.
With respect to independent claims 23 and 24, Appellant argues that
Gallant teaches the use of profile information associated with party B as the
basis for disabling a custom calling feature and Appellant relies upon the
reasons advanced with respect to independent claim 1 (Br. 13-14) which we
did not find persuasive above. Therefore, we will sustain the rejection of
independent claims 23 and 24.
To summarize, we have sustained the rejection of claims 1-24 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a).
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: November 3, 2007