The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GLORIA DECARLO MASSARO,
DONALD MASSARO and ROSHANTHA A. CHANDRARATNA
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0852
Application No. 09/919,195
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: August 28, 2007
__________
Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, NANCY J. LINCK, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The Appellants appeal the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 13-28 for
lack of written description. The claims are also rejected for anticipation and lack
of enablement. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2006).
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013