Ex Parte Davidson et al - Page 1



                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                    
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   ____________                                                        
                      Ex parte ELIZABETH JANINA DAVIDSON and FIONA CRAIG                                               
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal 2007-0860                                                      
                                              Application 10/148,535                                                   
                                             Technology Center 1600                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                             Decided: August 23, 2007                                                  
                                                   ____________                                                        


                 Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK                                             
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 Opinion by GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.  Dissenting Opinion by                                 
                 Linck, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                                    
                 Examiner’s final rejection of claims 2, 3, and 7.  We have jurisdiction under                         
                 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  The claims are reproduced below:                                                   
                 7. A method for treating a condition selected from the group consisting                               
                 of convulsant states, bipolar disorder, wherein said method comprises                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013