Ex Parte Weiss - Page 6

            Appeal 2007-0872                                                                                
            Application 10/159,762                                                                          

        1   side hem for reception of guide rods.  On the other hand, Fernandez Lopez shows                 
        2   that a hem at the margin of the roller blind web can be woven directly in the                   
        3   material of the web.  This is hem 10 of Fernandez Lopez designed for the reception              
        4   of the flat bar weight.  Thus, Fernandez Lopez is suggestive of weaving a pocket                
        5   into a fabric and using the pocket for receipt of a rod or member that is to be                 
        6   placed at the margin or edge of the fabric web.  Accordingly, it is seen that to                
        7   replace the sewn hems of Schaap with a pocket woven directly into the fabric is a               
        8   simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results.             
        9   See KSR at 1740.  Appellant’s argument regarding lack of motivation to combine is               
       10   unavailing in face of the Supreme Court’s decision in KSR.  Furthermore, it is not              
       11   seen that whether all the woven pockets extend in a warp direction or in a weft                 
       12   direction is a feature of patentable significance.  Therefore, Appellant’s argument             
       13   directed to whether a hem is formed integrally on the bottom or side of the roller              
       14   shade is not convincing.                                                                        
       15          With respect to the rejection of claim 24, however, we do not find the                   
       16   disclosure in any of the cited prior art involving woven or knitted webs which have             
       17   pockets that extend in both the web weft and web warp directions simultaneously.                
       18   Accordingly, we do not affirm the rejection of claim 24.                                        
       19          Similarly, with respect to the rejections of claims 29, 32, and 37-39, we will           
       20   affirm the rejection of these claims.  Fernandez Lopez is a recognition in the art              
       21   that pockets for the receipt of reinforcing rods, weights, or the like can be woven             
       22   into the fabric rather than stitched therein.  Accordingly, it is our view that the             
       23   provision of pockets in Gottschalk that are woven directly into the fabric is simply            
       24   combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable                    
       25   results.  Id.  We do not agree with Appellant’s contention that the fabric of                   
       26   Gottschalk has already been guided before the pipes are received in the pockets.                

                                                     6                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013