Ex Parte Howard et al - Page 1

                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                          Ex parte WALTER HOWARD,                                                      
                                                GARY SMITH and                                                         
                                                  JULIE MORRIS                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2007-0875                                                      
                                              Application 10/774,692                                                   
                                             Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                             Decided: March 28, 2007                                                   
                 Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and JEFFREY T.                                              
                 SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                 WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to                         
                 allow claims 11-20, 22-29, and 31-33 as amended subsequent to the final                               
                 rejection (see the Amendment dated April 11, 2006, entered as per the                                 
                 Advisory Action dated April 20, 2006).  Claims 11-20, 22-29, and 31-33 are                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013