onecle

Ex Parte Hejza Litwiller - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                          Ex parte DEBORA MARGARET HEJZA LITWILLER                                          
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Appeal No. 2007-0919                                              
                                          Application 10/179,555                                            
                                         Technology Center 2100                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: February 26, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before JOSEPH F. RUGIERO, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JAY P. LUCAS,                                  
               Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
               HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                 
                      Appellant appeals from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 4 and                 
               5 pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b)                  
               to decide this appeal.                                                                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013