onecle

Ex Parte Rhoades - Page 1



                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte Dean L. Rhoades                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0924                                                
                                          Application 10/401,079                                            
                                         Technology Center 3700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: October 24, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  


               Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and JENNIFER                                     
               D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                 
                      Dean L. Rhoades (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                    
               Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 16-18.  Claims 3,                 
               4, 6, 7 and 11-15 stand withdrawn from consideration.  We have jurisdiction                  
               over this appeal under 35 U.S.C.  6 (2002).                                                 

                                               THE INVENTION                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013