onecle

Ex Parte Cornelius et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                      Ex parte SHAWN S. CORNELIUS, CLIFFORD DONOUGHE,                                       
                            ARNOLD Z. HUFFMAN, RICHARD R. KRAHN,                                            
                                      and MICHAEL S. SWEENEY                                                
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0928                                                
                                          Application 09/943,964                                            
                                         Technology Center 2100                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 10, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  


               Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and                                                  
               JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
               RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s                           
               rejection of claims 1-23.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                      
                      We affirm-in-part.                                                                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013