The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHAWN S. CORNELIUS, CLIFFORD DONOUGHE,
ARNOLD Z. HUFFMAN, RICHARD R. KRAHN,
and MICHAEL S. SWEENEY
____________
Appeal 2007-0928
Application 09/943,964
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: August 10, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-23. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013