onecle

Ex Parte Hensbergen et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               __________                                                   
                                 Ex parte ERIC VAN HENSBERGEN and                                           
                                    RAMAKRISHNAN RAJAMONY                                                   
                                               __________                                                   
                                            Appeal 2007-0941                                                
                                          Application 10/165,068                                            
                                         Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                                          Decided: May 22, 2007                                             
                                               __________                                                   
               Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JAY P. LUCAS, and                                                
               ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the                        
               Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-23.                                                         
                                            THE INVENTION                                                   
                      The disclosed invention is directed to a connection routing method                    
               and system in an intelligent network controller.  The network controller may                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013