Appeal 2007-0944
Application 11/159,426
would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize a
press-fit as the sole means for retaining contact pressure.
As a final point with respect to the § 103 rejection, we note that
Appellants base no argument upon objective evidence of nonobviousness,
such as unexpected results.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv).
AFFIRMED
cam
Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C.
400 West Maple Road
Suite 350
Birmingham, MI 48009
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013