The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERIC THOMAS GOHR, NILES RICHARD ROSENQUIST,
RAJENDRA KASHINATH SINGH, GREGORY JAMES STODDARD,
SHAHRZAD ZARKOOB, and
JOHANNES MARTINUS DINA GOOSSENS
____________
Appeal 2007-0951
Application 10/740,074
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 31, 2007
____________
Before CATHERINE Q. TIMM, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-9
and 21-29.1 We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b) (2006).
1 An oral hearing was conducted on May 9, 2007.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013