Ex Parte Topp et al - Page 5

               Appeal 2007-0955                                                                             
               Application 10/297,899                                                                       
                                                                                                           
                                          FINDINGS OF FACT                                                  
                      Oka discloses a junction connector with junction circuits including                   
               multiple bus bar layers 14 and 16 separated by an insulating sheet 17.  In one               
               embodiment, multiple bus bars 13 and 15 in the first and second bus bar                      
               layers 14 and 16 are fitted into corresponding grooves 17a disposed on                       
               opposite sides of the insulating sheet.  End tabs 13a, 13b, 15a, and 15b are                 
               provided on opposite ends of the bus bars 13 and 15.                                         
                      Selected bus bars 13 and 15 are connected together at cross positions                 
               P1-P6 through openings 17b in the insulating sheet.  To this end, bus bars 13                
               are bent such that they contact bus bars 15.  See Fig. 7.  Both bus bars are                 
               then joined by resistance welding or, alternatively, by fasteners (Oka, col. 3,              
               l. 64 – col. 4, l. 35; col. 5, ll. 64-67; Figs. 5A-7 and 13).                                

                                          PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                                 
                      Anticipation is established only when a single prior art reference                    
               discloses, expressly or under the principles of inherency, each and every                    
               element of a claimed invention as well as disclosing structure which is                      
               capable of performing the recited functional limitations.  RCA Corp. v.                      
               Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385,                       
               388 (Fed. Cir. 1984); W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721                   
               F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983).                                         

                                               ANALYSIS                                                     
                      We agree with the Examiner that Oka fully meets all limitations of                    
               independent claim 11.   First, the scope and breadth of the claim language                   
               simply does not preclude the end tabs 13a of the first bus bars 13 as                        

                                                     5                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013