onecle

Ex Parte da Cunha et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                      
                                            precedent of the Board.                                              

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                     
                 Ex parte JOHN M. da CUNHA, ANDREW KOLL, and ERIC T. MARTIN                                      
                                                ____________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-0961                                                   
                                            Application 10/264,131                                               
                                           Technology Center 2600                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                                         Decided: September 26, 2007                                             
                                                ____________                                                     

                Before JOHN C. MARTIN, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                                
                MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 

                BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This appeal involves claims 1-21, the only claims pending in this                         
                application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b), 134(a).                              
                       We affirm-in-part.                                                                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013