onecle

Ex Parte Horak et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                             Ex parte DAVID V. HORAK, CHUNG H. LAM                                           
                                         and HON-SUM P. WONG                                                 
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-0970                                                
                                          Application 10/732,580                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                         Decided:  March 1, 2007                                             
                                            ________________                                                 

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                              
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8, 10-18, and 20.               
                Claims 21-30 are withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-                    
                elected invention.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                 
                1. A storage device comprising:                                                              
                      a first electrode;                                                                     

                                                                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013