Ex Parte Taylor et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                 for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                ____________                                                 
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                ____________                                                 
                                         Ex parte ALEX S. TAYLOR                                             
                                         and ERCAN E. KURUOGLU                                               
                                                ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal 2007-0976                                               
                                           Application 09/981,835                                            
                                           Technology Center 2100                                            
                                                ____________                                                 
                                           Decided: May 22, 2007                                             
                                                ____________                                                 
                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS,                                             
                and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Taylor and Kuruoglu (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                     
                the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 16, 18, and                  
                19, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013