Ex Parte Higashi et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written            
                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                           ____________                                               
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                           ____________                                               
                                    Ex parte KENICHI HIGASHI                                          
                                    AND YOUSUKE TSUKUDA                                               
                                           ____________                                               
                                          Appeal 2007-1004                                            
                                       Application 09/842,248                                         
                                      Technology Center 1700                                          
                                           ____________                                               
                                       Decided: May 23, 2007                                          
                                           ____________                                               
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and PETER F. KRATZ,                             
               Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                     This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-19.            
               We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                               









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013