onecle

Ex Parte Vo - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                Ex parte HAHN VO                                                       
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal 2007-1061                                                      
                                              Application 09/967,601                                                   
                                             Technology Center 2143                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                             Decided: March 27, 2007                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                        

                 Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTION, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JAY P.                                               
                 LUCAS,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
                 HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                                          STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                        
                        Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                              
                 claims 1 to 25 and 27 to 30.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                            







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013