The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSEF ALTENBUCHNER, ANDREAS BOMMARIUS, RALF
MATTES, CHRISTOPH SYLDATK, WILHELM TISCHER,
ANJA WIESE, and BURKARD WILMS
__________
Appeal 2007-1069
Application 10/334,990
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: June 15, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 17-19,
21-24, 26-28, 30-38, and 41-46. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b). We reverse the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second
paragraphs and § 103, but affirm the rejection for nonstatutory obvious-type
double-patenting.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013