The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANDREW X. CHEN, JUN FAN, XI-YUN YU, and
MARTHA J. WHITEHOUSE
__________
Appeal 2007-1073
Application 10/308,176
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: May 23, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and
RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134. The Examiner has rejected
the claims for obviousness, indefiniteness, and lack of written description.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm the obviousness
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013