Ex Parte Signorini - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                
                                         precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                                                                            
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                   
                                     Ex parte KAREN T. SIGNORINI                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1097                                                
                                          Application 10/230,593                                             
                                             Technology 2800                                                 
                                               ___________                                                   
                                       Decided:  September 21, 2007                                          
                                               ___________                                                   
                Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, RICHARD TORCZON, and                                          
                MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
                HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
           1          A. STATEMENT OF CASE                                                                   
           2          The Appellant seeks review under 35 U.S.C.  134 of a final rejection                  
           3    of claims 1, 8-11, and 18-28, all of the claims pending in the application.                  
           4          We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                           
           5          The application on appeal was filed on August 29, 2002.                                
           6          The real party in interest is Micron Technology, Inc.                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013