Ex Parte Trethewey - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     
                                                                                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                   
                                    Ex parte JAMES R. TRETHEWEY                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1099                                                
                                          Application 09/955,469                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                          Decided: June 12, 2007                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                Before LEE E. BARRETT, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and                                              
                ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                         
                Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-40.   It is our view, after consideration of                
                the record before us, that the evidence relied upon does not support the                     
                Examiner’s rejection of the claims on appeal.  Accordingly, we REVERSE.                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013