onecle

Ex Parte Zazovsky - Page 1



                       THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                          
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                    
                precedent of the Board.                                                                      


                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                   
                                   Ex parte ALEXANDER ZAZOVSKY                                               
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1101                                                
                                          Application 10/248,535                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                          Decided: July 18, 2007                                             
                                                __________                                                   


                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and ALLEN R.                                        
                MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  


                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 5, 8 through 13, 15 through 19,                  
                21, 22, and 28 through 30, the record reflecting that the Examiner has set                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013