Ex Parte DeLuga et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2007-1106                                                                             
                Application 10/965,055                                                                       
           1    Fukushima.4  The examiner has withdrawn the rejection against claims 11-                     
           2    17.5                                                                                         

                                             ANTICIPATION                                                    
           3          Claim 22 is written in means-plus-function format as follows:6                         
           4          22. A battery, comprising:                                                             
           5                means for providing power;                                                       
           6                means for housing the means for providing power;                                 
           7                means for attaching the means for housing to a bottom                            
           8          surface of a notebook computer; and                                                    
           9                means, associated with the means for housing, for                                
          10          receiving at least a portion of the [sic, a] docking station when                      
          11          the means for housing is attached to the notebook computer and                         
          12          the notebook computer is attached to the docking station.                              
          13          The examiner urges7 that claim 22 is anticipated because Shin shows                    
          14    a battery 4, which the examiner notes inherently contains cells for providing                
          15    power, housing for the cells (the surfaces of the battery), attaching means 46,              
          16    and means for receiving a portion of the docking station, which the examiner                 
          17    associates with the bottom of the battery 4.                                                 
          18          HP contests the examiner's construction of the receiving means.8                       
          19    Specifically, HP points to Figures 1-3 of the specification for the                          
                                                                                                            
                4 Answer 8-9.                                                                                
                5 Answer 2.                                                                                  
                6 All claim language is taken from the appendix to the Appeal Brief (Appeal                  
                Br.).  The portions of the agency record cited in this opinion may be viewed                 
                via the Patent Application Information and Retrieval system.                                 
                7 Answer 3-4.                                                                                
                8 Appeal Br. 5-6.                                                                            
                                                     3                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013