Ex Parte Cooney et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                             
                                today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                   
                                     Ex parte TIMOTHY J. COONEY,                                             
                                RAYMOND GOSS, WILLIAM WARREN,                                                
                                THOMAS AKERS, and JASON HOLLAR                                               
                                                __________                                                   
                                           Appeal No. 2007-1110                                              
                                        Application No. 09/832,603                                           
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                       Decided: September 24, 2007                                           
                                                __________                                                   
            Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD and                                                   
            HUBERT C. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
            LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                   This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-20.                  
            35 U.S.C.  134 (2002).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6 (b) (2002).                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013