The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte RONALD CAUDILL,
ROBERT BECK, GARY NEWMAN,
and LIM HONORIO
____________________
Appeal 2007-1112
Application 10/692,116
Technology Center 3700
____________________
Decided: 19 July 2007
____________________
Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SALLY GARDNER LANE, and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative
Patent Judges.
LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Statement of the case
This ex parte appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) is from a rejection of
claims 1-16 of application 10/692,116.
We affirm the Examiner’s rejections.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013