Appeal 2007-1117
Application 09/825,495
user’s service request, and intelligently routing the service request to the
selected application service provider server to perform the request. Nothing
in the claims on appeal requires that the criteria used by Duursma for
making the intelligent selection must be the same criteria set forth in the
specification disclosed by Appellant.
With respect to the claimed register, the application database 48 in
Duursma performs the claimed function. The parameters set forth in the
specification are not in the claims on appeal, and we will not import them
into the claims (Reply Br. 5).
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Anticipation has been established by the Examiner because Duursma
intelligently selects and routes a user’s request to an application service
provider server, and Duursma describes a database that operates like the
claimed register.
DECISION
The anticipation rejection of claims 1 to 25 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013