Ex Parte Schneck et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                  __________                                                     
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  __________                                                     
                          Ex parte JONATHAN SCHNECK and SEAN O’HERRIN                                            
                                                  __________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-11611                                                  
                                            Application 09/954,166                                               
                                           Technology Center 1600                                                
                                                  __________                                                     
                                            Decided: July 09, 2007                                               
                                                  __________                                                     
                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, TONI R. SCHEINER, and                                                    
                RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 43-52                     
                and 54-61.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We affirm.                             
                                           STATEMENT OF CASE                                                     
                       The claims are directed to a method of making a molecular complex                         
                comprising two first fusion proteins and two second fusion proteins.  The                        
                first fusion protein comprises an immunoglobulin heavy chain comprising a                        

                                                                                                                
                1 Heard May 17, 2007.                                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013