The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHARLES A. LESBURG, MICHAEL CABLE, ZHI HONG,
ANTHONY F. MANNARINO, and PATRICIA C. WEBER
__________
Appeal 2007-1164
Application 10/170,131
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: May 31, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER , ERIC GRIMES, and
RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ , Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a
computer comprising specific data. The Examiner has rejected the claims as
obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Because we agree
with the Examiner that the patentability of a computer does not depend on
the data stored in it, we affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013