The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT DODGE, EDWARD DENNIS HILLEN,
and GEORGE DARYL BLANKENSHIP
_____________
Appeal 2007-1202
Application 10/847,052
Technology Center 2800
______________
Decided: May 18, 2007
_______________
Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and ROBERT E.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of
claims 1 through 6, 8 through 21, and 23 through 33, claims 7 and 22 are
objected to but contain allowable subject matter. For the reasons stated infra,
we affirm the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013