Ex Parte Wu et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   
                                                                                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               __________                                                   
                         Ex parte XIAOJU WU, PINHAI HAO, IMRAN KHAN,                                        
                       JOZEF C. MITROS, JAMES R. TODD, and ROBERT PAN                                       
                                               __________                                                   
                                            Appeal 2007-1234                                                
                                          Application 10/017,990                                            
                                         Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                                          Decided: July 13, 2007                                            
                                               __________                                                   
               Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                                 
               ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the                        
               Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-30.  We have jurisdiction under                             
               35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                                            
                      We AFFIRM.                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013