The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL EDWARD BASKEY, MARK LINUS BAUMAN,
BOB RICHARD CERNOHOUS, JOHN CHARLES KASPERSKI, and
STEVEN JOHN SIMONSON
____________
Appeal 2007-1238
Application 10/037,595
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 7, 2007
____________
Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, ALLEN R. MaCDONALD, and
JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 10, 12, 13, and 15 through 34.
Claims 4, 11, and 14 have been cancelled. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal. We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013