The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte G. DEAN BARRETT and
JOHN A. CONKLING
____________
Appeal 2007-1254
Application 10/352,542
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: April 24, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 30, 32-36, 40, 45, 82, 84-86,
89-94, and 106-108 (claims 96-102 were cancelled in an amendment after
the Final Rejection; Br. 2).1 The only other claims in this application are
1 We refer to and cite from Appellants’ Substitute Brief dated Oct. 6, 2006.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013