Appeal 2007-1259
Application 10/054,213
VI. Conclusion
Stimming has not shown that “a means for impressing a positive
voltage pulse on the anode” as it appears in claim 1 is not anticipated by the
fuel starvation methods recited in Wilkinson.
VII.
Upon consideration of the record and for reasons given, it is
ORDERED that the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, 8, 10,
and 11 under 35 USC 102(b) is AFFIRMED; and
FURTHER ORDERED that no time period for taking any
subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37
C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
smt
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013