The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BOHUMIL LOJEK and
PHILIP O. SMITH
____________
Appeal 2007-1274
Application 10/850,897
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: April 30, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and CHUNG K.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)
On this record, we determine that this case is not ripe for meaningful
review and is, therefore, remanded to the Examiner for appropriate action
not inconsistent with the instruction set forth below.
At pages 3 through 5 of the Answer, the Examiner set forth, inter alia,
the following rejection:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013