The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte KOICHI SATO
____________________
Appeal 2007-1275
Application 09/824,2481
Technology Center 2600
____________________
Decided: August 8, 2007
____________________
Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, ALLEN R. MACDONALD,
and SCOTT R. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final rejection of
claims 9, 10, and 12-16, all the claims pending in the application. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm.
1 Application filed April 3, 2001. The real party in interest is PENTAX
Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013