Ex Parte Sato - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                   
                                           precedent of the Board                                             
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                          ____________________                                                
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                          ____________________                                                
                                          Ex parte KOICHI SATO                                                
                                          ____________________                                                
                                             Appeal 2007-1275                                                 
                                          Application 09/824,2481                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                              
                                          ____________________                                                
                                          Decided: August 8, 2007                                             
                                          ____________________                                                
                Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, ALLEN R. MACDONALD,                                             
                and SCOTT R. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the final rejection of                  
                claims 9, 10, and 12-16, all the claims pending in the application.  We have                  
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                          
                      We affirm.                                                                              

                                                                                                             
                1  Application filed April 3, 2001.  The real party in interest is PENTAX                     
                Corporation.                                                                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013