Ex Parte Richlen et al - Page 3

              Appeal 2007-1323                                                                     
              Application 10/032,701                                                               
              side edges of said front and rear body panels, and wherein said absorbent            
              composite is connected to said front and rear body panels.                           

                    The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show              
              unpatentability:                                                                     
              Igaue    UK 2 267 024   Nov. 24, 1993                                                
              Van Gompel    PCT WO 00/47152   Aug. 17, 2000                                        

                    The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                    
              1.  Claims 11-20, 31-40, 45, and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)          
              as anticipated by Igaue                                                              
              2.  Claims 11-20, 31-40, 45, and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)          
              as obvious over Igaue.                                                               
              3.  Claims 42, 44, 47, and 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as              
              unpatentable over the combination of Igaue and Van Gompel.                           
                    We affirm the rejections under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) and reverse the               
              rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).                                                  

                                          DISCUSSION                                               
              Igaue:                                                                               
                    Claims 11-20, 31-40, 45, and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
              § 102(b) as anticipated by Igaue.                                                    
                    The claims are drawn to an absorbent garment (claims 11-20 and 45)             
              and a method of using an absorbent garment (claims 31-40 and 46).                    
              According to Appellants’ Specification, “[a]bsorbent garments can be                 
              configured as . . . a diaper-type product . . .” (Specification 1).  The claims      
              require the garment to comprise a body panel having a line of weakness               

                                                3                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013