onecle

Ex Parte Zettel et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                       Ex parte IGNATIUS M. ZETTEL and KEVIN R. CLAYTON                                      
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1361                                                
                                          Application 09/681,573                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: October 24, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, LANCE LEONARD BARRY,                                             
                and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                                     I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-29.  The Appellants appeal                         
                therefrom under 35 U.S.C.  134(a).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                    
                 6(b).                                                                                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013