Ex Parte No Data - Page 19

                Appeal 2007-1366                                                                              
                Application 90/005,090                                                                        
           1    example, Patentee notes that Quaal does not expressly describe making                         
           2    TRIS from MAS and TMCS alone.7                                                                
           3          One having ordinary skill in the art would have understood the                          
           4    chemistry involved in Quaal’s process and would have expected that TRIS                       
           5    could be made by hydrolysis of MAS and TMCS alone.  Quaal teaches a                           
           6    general reaction for making tris-siloxy acrylic silanes, such as TRIS, having                 
           7    the general formula (R3SiO)3Si-R’-OOCC(R”)=CH2.  This process involves                        
           8    the cohydrolysis of two compounds, a compound having the formula                              
           9    X3Si-R’-OOCC(R”)=CH2 and an excess of a compound of the type R3SiX.                           
          10    Thus, Quaal’s basic process only requires cohydrolysis of two compounds.                      
          11          Patentee also makes much of the fact that Quaal’s Example 1, which                      
          12    is directed to making TRIS, does not teach making TRIS by cohydrolysis of                     
          13    MAS and TMCS alone.                                                                           
          14          Quaal’s Example 1 describes the cohydrolysis of MAS and TMCS                            
          15    and a third compound, (CH3)3SiOCH3.  Example 1 in no way diminishes                           
          16    Quaal’s general teaching of reacting two compounds and is totally consistent                  
          17    with that teaching.  A reference must be evaluated for all that it teaches, and               
          18    is not limited to its examples or preferred embodiments.  Merck & Co. v.                      
          19    Biocraft Labs., Inc., 874 F.2d 804, 807, 10 USPQ2d 1843, 1846 (Fed. Cir.                      
          20    1989); In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794 n.1, 215 USPQ 569, 570 n.1                         
          21    (CCPA 1982); In re Lamberti, 545 F.2d 747, 750, 192 USPQ 278, 280                             
          22    (CCPA 1976).  Additionally, Quaal’s general reaction may be represented                       
          23    by the following equation:                                                                    
          24       X3Si-R’-OOCC(R”)=CH2  + R3SiX (in H20) ═> (R3SiO)3Si-R’-OOCC(R”)=CH2                       
                                                                                                             
                7 As we stated above at p. 9 we have adopted Patentee’s construction of the                   
                literal scope of Claim 1 as permitting only the cohydrolysis of MAS and                       
                TMCS.                                                                                         

                                                    - 19 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013