Ex Parte He et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte YANGHUA HE,                                                
                                          CHAD J. KANESHIGE                                                  
                                         and MICHAEL S. WANG                                                 
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1394                                                
                                          Application 10/301,464                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 30, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                  
                PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of                 
                claims 5-25, the only claims that remain pending in this application.  We                    
                have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013