The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL A. ZULPA, CHARLES PATRICK CLARKE,
and THOMAS E. DONOVAN
____________
Appeal 2007-1401
Application 09/882,094
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: August 23, 2007
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, LINDA E. HORNER, and
DAVID B. WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, and 9. The Appellants canceled claim 10 and withdrew claims
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013