onecle

Ex Parte Zulpa et al - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                           ____________                                             
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           ____________                                             
                     Ex parte PAUL A. ZULPA, CHARLES PATRICK CLARKE,                                
                                   and THOMAS E. DONOVAN                                            
                                           ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-1401                                           
                                       Application 09/882,094                                       
                                      Technology Center 3600                                        
                                           ____________                                             
                                      Decided:  August 23, 2007                                     
                                           ____________                                             
           Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, LINDA E. HORNER, and                                         
           DAVID B. WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
           HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                            

                                   STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                            
                 The Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C.  134 of the rejection of           
           claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, and 9.  The Appellants canceled claim 10 and withdrew claims       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013